leather: be at department store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.58
, texture
Weight: 0.58
, fabric
Weight: 0.58
Siblings belt
Weight: 0.62
, sole
Weight: 0.49
, silk
Weight: 0.35
, velvet
Weight: 0.35
, linen
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at department store 1.00
be at store 0.88
be at jewelry store 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fabric, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(leather, be at department store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fabric, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(velvet, be at jewelry store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fabric, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(leather, be at department store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(velvet, be at jewelry store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(velvet, be at jewelry store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(leather, be at department store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(leather, be at department store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(leather, be at department store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fabric, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(velvet, be at jewelry store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(leather, be at department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fabric, be at store)