lecturer: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.59
, speaker
Weight: 0.57
, man
Weight: 0.53
, activity
Weight: 0.53
Siblings professor
Weight: 0.37
, scholar
Weight: 0.36
, scientist
Weight: 0.35
, researcher
Weight: 0.35
, author
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(lecturer, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lecturer, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lecturer, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lecturer, has quality questions)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(lecturer, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lecturer, has quality questions)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lecturer, has quality questions)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lecturer, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lecturer, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lecturer, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lecturer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lecturer, has quality bad)