led: be more efficient energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
, part
Weight: 0.56
, light source
Weight: 0.53
, lamp
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trigger
Weight: 0.30
, stem
Weight: 0.30
, ending
Weight: 0.30
, third
Weight: 0.30
, in
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient energy 1.00
have efficient energy 0.98
be efficient 0.94
is efficient 0.94
use less energy 0.89
save energy 0.80
use less power 0.79
is more expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(led, be more efficient energy)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(led, use less energy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(led, use less energy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(led, use less energy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(led, use less energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(led, use less power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(led, use less power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(led, use less power)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(led, have efficient energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(led, use less power)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(led, have efficient energy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(led, be efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(led, is efficient)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(led, have efficient energy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(led, have efficient energy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(led, save energy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(led, be efficient)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(led, be efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(led, be efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(led, is efficient)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(led, is efficient)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(led, is efficient)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(led, save energy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(led, save energy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(led, save energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(led, be more efficient energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(led, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(led, be more efficient energy)