ledger: be at bookkeeper office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, record
Weight: 0.57
, article
Weight: 0.54
, book
Weight: 0.51
, account
Weight: 0.49
Siblings business card
Weight: 0.32
, postage stamp
Weight: 0.31
, debit card
Weight: 0.31
, index card
Weight: 0.31
, sheet
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bookkeeper office 1.00
be at accountant office 0.85
be keep by accountant 0.79
be at office 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(record, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ledger, be at bookkeeper office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(record, be at office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(record, be at office)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(business card, be at office)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(index card, be at office)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(record, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ledger, be at bookkeeper office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(index card, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(index card, be at office)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(business card, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(business card, be at office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(ledger, be at bookkeeper office)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ledger, be at accountant office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ledger, be at accountant office)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be at accountant office)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(ledger, be at accountant office)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ledger, be keep by accountant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be keep by accountant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ledger, be keep by accountant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ledger, be keep by accountant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ledger, be at bookkeeper office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(record, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(business card, be at office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(index card, be at office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ledger, be at bookkeeper office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(record, be at office)