leeds: hate galatasaray

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.59
, club
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35
, birmingham
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate galatasaray 1.00
is hated 0.80
be united hated 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is hated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united hated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(birmingham, is hated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is hated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(manchester, be united hated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(manchester, be united hated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(leeds, hate galatasaray)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is hated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(leeds, is hated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(leeds, is hated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(leeds, be united hated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(leeds, be united hated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(leeds, be united hated)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(leeds, is hated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leeds, be united hated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(leeds, hate galatasaray)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(leeds, hate galatasaray)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(birmingham, is hated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(leeds, hate galatasaray)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(manchester, be united hated)