leeds: have owls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.59
, club
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35
, birmingham
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have owls 1.00
be called peacocks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(leeds, have owls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(leeds, have owls)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(leeds, have owls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(leeds, be called peacocks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(leeds, have owls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(leeds, be called peacocks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(leeds, have owls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(leeds, be called peacocks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(leeds, have owls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(leeds, be called peacocks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(leeds, have owls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(leeds, have owls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(leeds, have owls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(leeds, have owls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(leeds, have owls)