legend: be okocha

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents myth
Weight: 0.65
, artist
Weight: 0.62
, fairy tale
Weight: 0.60
, tale
Weight: 0.60
, story
Weight: 0.60
Siblings buddy holly
Weight: 0.68
, billy joel
Weight: 0.64
, louis armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, tom jones
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be gonchar 1.00
be okocha 1.00
be lindros 1.00
be puyol 1.00
be on spotify 0.78
come be 0.77
be considered work 0.76
have downvotes 0.76
be with 30 0.76
remain today 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(story, be with 30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(legend, be okocha)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(myth, come be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(legend, be okocha)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(myth, remain today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(legend, be okocha)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(myth, remain today)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(myth, come be)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(story, be with 30)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(myth, remain today)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(story, be with 30)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(myth, come be)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tom jones, be considered work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(story, be with 30) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(legend, be okocha)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(myth, come be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(legend, be okocha)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(myth, remain today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(legend, be okocha)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tom jones, be considered work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tom jones, be considered work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(legend, be okocha)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(legend, be puyol)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(legend, be lindros)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(legend, be puyol)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(legend, be puyol)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(legend, be lindros)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(legend, be lindros)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(legend, be gonchar)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(legend, be gonchar)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(legend, be gonchar)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(legend, be gonchar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(legend, be puyol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(legend, be lindros)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(legend, be okocha)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(myth, come be)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(myth, remain today)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(story, be with 30)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tom jones, be considered work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(myth, come be)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(myth, remain today)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(legend, be okocha) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(story, be with 30)