lemming: adapt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prey
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.52
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, animal
Weight: 0.47
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.32
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.32
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.31
, hare
Weight: 0.31
, vole
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt 1.00
adapt to tundra 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(species, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lemming, adapt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(species, adapt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(species, adapt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(species, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lemming, adapt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(lemming, adapt)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lemming, adapt to tundra)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lemming, adapt to tundra)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lemming, adapt to tundra)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lemming, adapt to tundra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lemming, adapt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lemming, adapt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(species, adapt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(lemming, adapt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(species, adapt)