lemur: be at hole

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents primate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, wild animal
Weight: 0.58
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, monkey
Weight: 0.45
Siblings orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36
, tree frog
Weight: 0.36
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hole 1.00
be at small hole in grind 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at hole)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(lemur, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lizard, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at hole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(lemur, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lemur, be at hole)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(lemur, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lemur, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(lemur, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lemur, be at hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lizard, be at hole)