length: was measured in olden days

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.66
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
, proportion
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
Siblings width
Weight: 0.74
, diameter
Weight: 0.65
, inch
Weight: 0.63
, height
Weight: 0.62
, distance
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
was measured in olden days 1.00
was measured in days 0.83
was measured in earlier days 0.80
be measured in years 0.80
be measured in light years 0.80
is measured at same time 0.79
is measured at time 0.79
was measured long ago 0.78
was measured 0.78
was measured ago 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(height, is measured at same time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(height, is measured at same time)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(height, is measured at same time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(length, was measured in olden days)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(length, was measured in days)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(length, was measured)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(length, was measured in earlier days)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(length, was measured in days)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(length, was measured)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(length, was measured long ago)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(length, was measured in days)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(length, was measured)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(length, was measured ago)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(length, was measured in earlier days)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(length, was measured in earlier days)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(length, was measured ago)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(length, was measured long ago)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(length, was measured ago)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(length, was measured long ago)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(length, was measured in earlier days)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(length, was measured in days)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(length, was measured ago)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(length, was measured long ago)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(length, was measured)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(length, was measured in olden days)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(length, was measured in olden days)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(length, was measured in olden days)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(height, is measured at same time)