lens: be at device that require optic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58
, optic
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at device that require optic 1.00
be at optical device 0.87
has many part deal with optic 0.85
be at optical rangefinder 0.78
has lens and retina 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(human eye, has lens and retina)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(human eye, has many part deal with optic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(human eye, has many part deal with optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(human eye, has many part deal with optic)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(human eye, has lens and retina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(human eye, has lens and retina)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(lens, be at device that require optic)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lens, be at optical device)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(lens, be at optical rangefinder)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at optical rangefinder)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lens, be at optical rangefinder)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at optical device)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lens, be at optical device)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lens, be at optical rangefinder)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(lens, be at optical device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at device that require optic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lens, be at device that require optic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(human eye, has many part deal with optic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at device that require optic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(human eye, has lens and retina)