lens: be at read glass

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58
, optic
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at read glass 1.00
be at glass 0.92
be used to make glass 0.91
be made of glass 0.88
be a part of pair of glass 0.81
be at magnify glass 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be made of glass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(mirror, be made of glass)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mirror, be made of glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(lens, be at read glass)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lens, be made of glass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lens, be used to make glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lens, be at glass)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lens, be a part of pair of glass)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lens, be at glass)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lens, be at glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(lens, be used to make glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at glass)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lens, be at magnify glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(lens, be made of glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lens, be used to make glass)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lens, be a part of pair of glass)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lens, be at magnify glass)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lens, be made of glass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lens, be made of glass)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lens, be used to make glass)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lens, be a part of pair of glass)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lens, be a part of pair of glass)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(lens, be at magnify glass)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at magnify glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at read glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lens, be at read glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lens, be at read glass)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mirror, be made of glass)