lens: be needed in cameras

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.60
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, polymer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in cameras 1.00
be used in cameras 0.96
be used in camera 0.89
work in camera 0.86
be comparable to camera 0.77
be better than zoom lenses 0.76
be needed in glasses 0.75
be better than lenses for telescopes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses for telescopes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(prism, be needed in glasses)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be comparable to camera)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be used in camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(mirror, be used in camera)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mirror, be used in camera)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(human eye, be comparable to camera)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(human eye, be comparable to camera)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(prism, be needed in glasses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(prism, be needed in glasses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses for telescopes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses for telescopes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(lens, be needed in cameras)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lens, be used in cameras)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lens, be used in cameras)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lens, be used in cameras)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lens, be used in camera)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lens, be used in camera)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lens, work in camera)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(lens, be used in camera)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lens, work in camera)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(lens, be used in cameras)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lens, work in camera)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(lens, be used in camera)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lens, work in camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lens, be needed in cameras)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mirror, be used in camera)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(human eye, be comparable to camera)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(prism, be needed in glasses)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lens, be needed in cameras)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses for telescopes)