lens: have distortion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.60
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, polymer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
have distortion 1.00
form distorted images 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lens, have distortion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mirror, form distorted images)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have distortion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mirror, form distorted images) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mirror, form distorted images)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have distortion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(lens, have distortion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(lens, have distortion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lens, have distortion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lens, have distortion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have distortion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lens, have distortion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lens, have distortion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mirror, form distorted images)