lens: reduce size of objects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.60
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, polymer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
reduce size of objects 1.00
reduce size 0.91
magnify objects 0.82
make object look larger 0.81
collect energy on large scale 0.77
reduce accuracy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optics, reduce accuracy)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lens, reduce size of objects)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(optics, reduce accuracy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(optics, reduce accuracy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mirror, collect energy on large scale)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(optics, reduce accuracy)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(lens, reduce size of objects)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mirror, collect energy on large scale)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(mirror, collect energy on large scale)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(lens, reduce size of objects)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(lens, magnify objects)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lens, make object look larger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(lens, magnify objects)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lens, magnify objects)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lens, make object look larger)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lens, make object look larger)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(lens, make object look larger)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(lens, magnify objects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lens, reduce size of objects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lens, reduce size of objects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(optics, reduce accuracy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mirror, collect energy on large scale)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lens, reduce size of objects)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(optics, reduce accuracy)