lentil: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.67
, legume
Weight: 0.65
, cereal
Weight: 0.64
, grain
Weight: 0.64
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings black eyed pea
Weight: 0.63
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.37
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37
, chickpea
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
be more efficient humans eat than for cows 0.78
is less pure 0.76
be better than white 0.76
is cheap 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cereal, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lentil, is more expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(grain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lentil, is more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lentil, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(grain, is more expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cereal, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grain, is more expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cereal, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, is more expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, be better than white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(grain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lentil, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cereal, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lentil, is more expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lentil, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(wheat flour, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(wheat flour, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chickpea, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chickpea, is cheap)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(wheat flour, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, be better than white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lentil, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lentil, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(grain, is more expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cereal, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wheat flour, is more expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wheat flour, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wheat flour, be better than white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chickpea, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(grain, is more expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(lentil, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cereal, is expensive)