lentil: need soaked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.67
, legume
Weight: 0.65
, cereal
Weight: 0.64
, grain
Weight: 0.64
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings black eyed pea
Weight: 0.63
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.37
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.37
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37
, chickpea
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
need soaked 1.00
is soaked 0.97
need soaking 0.88
have soak 0.82
were washed in 1950 0.78
be destroyed sprayed with salt water 0.77
sprayed with salt water 0.76
be destroyed sprayed 0.76
is sprayed 0.76
need rinsed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(legume, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lentil, need soaked)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(legume, is soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lentil, need soaked)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(dish, were washed in 1950) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lentil, need soaked)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(crop, is sprayed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lentil, need soaked)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(crop, be destroyed sprayed with salt water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lentil, need soaked)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(crop, be destroyed sprayed with salt water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(dish, were washed in 1950)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(crop, is sprayed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(legume, is soaked)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(legume, need soaked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(crop, be destroyed sprayed with salt water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dish, were washed in 1950)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(legume, need soaked)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(legume, is soaked)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(crop, is sprayed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, is soaked)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, need soaked)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, need soaking)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, have soak)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, need rinsed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(legume, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lentil, need soaked)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(legume, is soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lentil, need soaked)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(dish, were washed in 1950) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lentil, need soaked)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(crop, be destroyed sprayed with salt water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lentil, need soaked)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(crop, is sprayed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lentil, need soaked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chickpea, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(chickpea, need soaked)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(chickpea, is soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chickpea, is soaked)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chickpea, need soaking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chickpea, need soaking)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chickpea, need rinsed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chickpea, need rinsed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(chickpea, have soak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chickpea, have soak)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(lentil, need soaked)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lentil, is soaked)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(lentil, is soaked)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is soaked)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lentil, is soaked)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lentil, need rinsed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(lentil, need rinsed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need rinsed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lentil, need rinsed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lentil, need soaked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(legume, is soaked)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(legume, need soaked)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(crop, be destroyed sprayed with salt water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(crop, is sprayed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dish, were washed in 1950)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chickpea, need soaked)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chickpea, is soaked)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chickpea, need soaking)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chickpea, have soak)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chickpea, need rinsed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(legume, is soaked)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(legume, need soaked)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(crop, be destroyed sprayed with salt water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(crop, is sprayed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(lentil, need soaked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dish, were washed in 1950)