level: have increasing dioxide

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, security
Weight: 0.57
, aspect
Weight: 0.56
Siblings high school
Weight: 0.66
, minimum
Weight: 0.65
, intensity
Weight: 0.61
, basic
Weight: 0.56
, graduate
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
have increasing dioxide 1.00
have dioxide 0.90
have rising gases 0.81
have low at noon dioxide 0.80
decreases with increasing distance 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(intensity, decreases with increasing distance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(intensity, decreases with increasing distance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(intensity, decreases with increasing distance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(level, have increasing dioxide)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(level, have low at noon dioxide)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(level, have rising gases)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(level, have low at noon dioxide)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(level, have rising gases)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(level, have rising gases)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(level, have rising gases)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(level, have low at noon dioxide)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(level, have low at noon dioxide)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(level, have increasing dioxide)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(level, have increasing dioxide)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(level, have increasing dioxide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(intensity, decreases with increasing distance)