lever: have mechanical efficiency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.56
, member
Weight: 0.56
, mechanism
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pedal
Weight: 0.57
, push button
Weight: 0.34
, joystick
Weight: 0.33
, button
Weight: 0.33
, time machine
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have mechanical efficiency 1.00
have greater mechanical efficiency 0.95
have efficiency 0.89
have greater efficiency 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(lever, have mechanical efficiency)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lever, have greater mechanical efficiency)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lever, have efficiency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lever, have greater efficiency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lever, have greater mechanical efficiency)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(lever, have efficiency)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lever, have efficiency)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lever, have greater mechanical efficiency)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lever, have greater mechanical efficiency)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lever, have efficiency)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(lever, have greater efficiency)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(lever, have greater efficiency)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(lever, have greater efficiency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lever, have mechanical efficiency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lever, have mechanical efficiency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lever, have mechanical efficiency)