lie: be called white lies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents truth
Weight: 0.63
, story
Weight: 0.59
, film
Weight: 0.57
, belief
Weight: 0.57
Siblings claim
Weight: 0.62
, excuse
Weight: 0.61
, true
Weight: 0.52
, straw man
Weight: 0.50
, fib
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called white lies 1.00
be called lies 0.96
be in white 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(film, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lie, be called white lies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(film, be in white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(film, be in white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(film, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(lie, be called white lies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(lie, be called white lies)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lie, be called lies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(lie, be called lies)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lie, be called lies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(lie, be called lies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lie, be called white lies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lie, be called white lies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(film, be in white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(lie, be called white lies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(film, be in white)