life: have hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, companion
Weight: 0.65
, family member
Weight: 0.63
, term
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mission
Weight: 0.63
, himself
Weight: 0.62
, relationship
Weight: 0.58
, retirement
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hard 1.00
be hard 0.98
hard 0.97
be has hard 0.97
have as hard 0.97
is hard 0.97
be hard time 0.94
is hard then 0.93
is hard work 0.93
was hard in 1930s 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(retirement, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(relationship, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(relationship, is hard)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(relationship, is hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(retirement, is hard)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(retirement, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, have hard)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(life, have hard)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(life, be hard)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(life, be hard)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(life, be hard)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(life, be hard)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(life, have hard)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, is hard)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(life, have hard)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(life, is hard)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, have hard)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(life, is hard)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(life, have hard)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(life, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(life, have hard)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(life, have hard)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, have hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(life, have hard)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(life, have hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(relationship, is hard)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(life, have hard)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(retirement, is hard)