light source: be seen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light
Weight: 0.79
, light bulb
Weight: 0.73
, element
Weight: 0.71
, source
Weight: 0.62
Siblings red light
Weight: 0.77
, blue light
Weight: 0.76
, black light
Weight: 0.76
, filament
Weight: 0.68
, ultraviolet
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be seen 1.00
be seen in dark 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source, be seen in dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(light source, be seen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source, be seen in dark)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(source, be seen in dark)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source, be seen in dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(light source, be seen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(light source, be seen)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(light source, be seen in dark)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(light source, be seen in dark)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(light source, be seen in dark)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(light source, be seen in dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(light source, be seen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(light source, be seen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(source, be seen in dark)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(light source, be seen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(source, be seen in dark)