light year: have dimension

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents year
Weight: 0.67
, distance
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.53
, planet
Weight: 0.51
, object
Weight: 0.50
Siblings month
Weight: 0.36
, decade
Weight: 0.33
, season
Weight: 0.33
, summer day
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have dimension 1.00
have dimension of length 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(year, have dimension of length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(light year, have dimension)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(year, have dimension of length)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(year, have dimension of length)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(year, have dimension of length) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(light year, have dimension)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(light year, have dimension)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(light year, have dimension of length)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(light year, have dimension of length)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(light year, have dimension of length)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(light year, have dimension of length)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(light year, have dimension)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(light year, have dimension)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(year, have dimension of length)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(light year, have dimension) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(year, have dimension of length)