light: be better than sound

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blue light
Weight: 0.66
, particle
Weight: 0.65
, cue
Weight: 0.61
, variable
Weight: 0.60
Siblings light source
Weight: 0.79
, light bulb
Weight: 0.76
, traffic light
Weight: 0.76
, red light
Weight: 0.75
, black light
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than sound 1.00
be faster than sound 0.93
be quicker than sound 0.93
have sound 0.89
be different from sound 0.88
be better at night 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red light, be better at night)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red light, be better at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(red light, be better at night)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(light, be better than sound)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(light, have sound)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(light, be faster than sound)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(light, be different from sound)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(light, be different from sound)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(light, be different from sound)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(light, be different from sound)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(light, have sound)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(light, be faster than sound)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(light, be better at night)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(light, be better at night)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(light, be better at night)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(light, be faster than sound)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(light, be faster than sound)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(light, be better at night)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(light, have sound)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(light, have sound)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(light, be better than sound)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(light, be better than sound)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(light, be better than sound) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red light, be better at night)