light: be make up of photon

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blue light
Weight: 0.66
, particle
Weight: 0.65
, cue
Weight: 0.61
, electronic device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings light source
Weight: 0.79
, light bulb
Weight: 0.76
, traffic light
Weight: 0.76
, red light
Weight: 0.75
, fog
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be make up of photon 1.00
be made of wave of photon 0.95
be compose of photon 0.95
be wave or particle 0.80
has different wavelength 0.78
has short wavelength than red light 0.77
mean visible electromagnetic wave 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(blue light, has short wavelength than red light)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(light, be make up of photon)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(blue light, has short wavelength than red light)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(blue light, has short wavelength than red light)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(blue light, has short wavelength than red light)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(light, be make up of photon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(light, be make up of photon)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(light, be compose of photon)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(light, be compose of photon)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(light, be compose of photon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(light, be wave or particle)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(light, be wave or particle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(light, be wave or particle)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(light, has different wavelength)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(light, has different wavelength)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(light, has different wavelength)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(light, has different wavelength)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(light, be compose of photon)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(light, be wave or particle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(light, be make up of photon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(light, be make up of photon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(blue light, has short wavelength than red light)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(light, be make up of photon)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(blue light, has short wavelength than red light)