lighting: be beneficial for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, electronics
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings projector
Weight: 0.34
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial for environment 1.00
be useful 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(projector, be useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(projector, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(projector, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(lighting, be beneficial for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be useful)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lighting, be useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lighting, be useful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lighting, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be beneficial for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(lighting, be beneficial for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(lighting, be beneficial for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(projector, be useful)