lime: be expensive in new zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.68
, flavor
Weight: 0.67
, substance
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lime juice
Weight: 0.39
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.37
, cinnamon
Weight: 0.36
, lemon
Weight: 0.36
, avocado
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in new zealand 1.00
be expensive in australia 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(avocado, be expensive in new zealand)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(avocado, be expensive in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(avocado, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(avocado, be expensive in new zealand)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(avocado, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(avocado, be expensive in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(lime, be expensive in new zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lime, be expensive in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(lime, be expensive in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lime, be expensive in australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lime, be expensive in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lime, be expensive in new zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lime, be expensive in new zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(avocado, be expensive in new zealand)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lime, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(avocado, be expensive in australia)