line: be at center of road

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, route
Weight: 0.67
, brand
Weight: 0.62
, mark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings straight line
Weight: 0.81
, power line
Weight: 0.75
, button
Weight: 0.63
, wall
Weight: 0.62
, face
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at center of road 1.00
refer to street and road 0.77
be paint on pave road 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(route, refer to street and road)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(line, be at center of road)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(route, refer to street and road)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(route, refer to street and road)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(route, refer to street and road)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(line, be at center of road)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(line, be at center of road)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(line, be paint on pave road)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(line, be paint on pave road)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(line, be paint on pave road)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(line, be paint on pave road)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(line, be at center of road)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(line, be at center of road)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(route, refer to street and road)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(line, be at center of road)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(route, refer to street and road)