line: be at post office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, route
Weight: 0.67
, brand
Weight: 0.62
, mark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings straight line
Weight: 0.81
, power line
Weight: 0.75
, button
Weight: 0.63
, wall
Weight: 0.62
, face
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at post office 1.00
be find in office 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(route, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(line, be at post office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(route, be at post office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(route, be at post office)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wall, be find in office)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(route, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(line, be at post office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wall, be find in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wall, be find in office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(line, be at post office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(line, be at post office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(line, be at post office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(route, be at post office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(wall, be find in office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(line, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(route, be at post office)