line: be at store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, route
Weight: 0.67
, brand
Weight: 0.62
, mark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings straight line
Weight: 0.81
, power line
Weight: 0.75
, button
Weight: 0.63
, wall
Weight: 0.62
, face
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at store 1.00
be find in restaurant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(line, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wall, be find in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(line, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(wall, be find in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(wall, be find in restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(line, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(line, be at store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(line, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(line, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(line, be at store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(line, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(line, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(line, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wall, be find in restaurant)