line: be important in drawing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, route
Weight: 0.67
, brand
Weight: 0.62
, mark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings red line
Weight: 0.84
, straight line
Weight: 0.81
, power line
Weight: 0.75
, blue line
Weight: 0.72
, button
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in drawing 1.00
be important in technical drawing 0.88
be drawn 0.84
be drawn on map 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(line, be important in drawing)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(line, be important in technical drawing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(line, be drawn)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(line, be important in technical drawing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(line, be important in technical drawing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(line, be drawn)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(line, be drawn)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(line, be drawn on map)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(line, be drawn on map)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(line, be drawn on map)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(line, be important in technical drawing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(line, be drawn)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(line, be drawn on map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(line, be important in drawing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(line, be important in drawing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(line, be important in drawing)