lingerie: be supposed fit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.63
, clothing store
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
, clothing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings thong
Weight: 0.52
, basque
Weight: 0.46
, nightgown
Weight: 0.43
, girdle
Weight: 0.43
, underwear
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be supposed fit 1.00
called going 0.77
have same shape 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(item, have same shape)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lingerie, be supposed fit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(item, have same shape)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(item, have same shape)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(underwear, called going)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(item, have same shape)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lingerie, be supposed fit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(underwear, called going)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(underwear, called going)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lingerie, be supposed fit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, be supposed fit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lingerie, be supposed fit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(item, have same shape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(underwear, called going)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(lingerie, be supposed fit)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(item, have same shape)