lingerie: exist in sub

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.63
, clothing store
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
, clothing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings thong
Weight: 0.52
, basque
Weight: 0.46
, nightgown
Weight: 0.43
, girdle
Weight: 0.43
, underwear
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
exist in sub 1.00
exist in indian sub 0.89
exist in sub conscious 0.87
exist 0.83
exist in indian sub conscious 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clothing, exist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lingerie, exist in sub)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(clothing, exist)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(clothing, exist)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(thong, exist)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(underwear, exist)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(clothing, exist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(underwear, exist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(underwear, exist)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(thong, exist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(thong, exist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lingerie, exist in sub)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in indian sub)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lingerie, exist in indian sub)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(lingerie, exist in indian sub)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lingerie, exist in indian sub)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in indian sub conscious)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub conscious)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lingerie, exist in indian sub conscious)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(lingerie, exist in sub conscious)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(lingerie, exist in indian sub conscious)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lingerie, exist in indian sub conscious)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub conscious)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lingerie, exist in sub conscious)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lingerie, exist in sub)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(clothing, exist)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(underwear, exist)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(thong, exist)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(lingerie, exist in sub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(clothing, exist)