lion: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.62
, cat
Weight: 0.61
, species
Weight: 0.61
, predator
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiger
Weight: 0.70
, sea lion
Weight: 0.39
, elephant
Weight: 0.36
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.36
, panda bear
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
is scary 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sea lion, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(elephant, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tiger, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tiger, is dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(elephant, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(elephant, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sea lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sea lion, is dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(grizzly bear, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(lion, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lion, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sea lion, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tiger, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(elephant, is dangerous)