lip: crack in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents skin
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
, sign
Weight: 0.56
Siblings eye
Weight: 0.62
, eyeliner
Weight: 0.45
, nose
Weight: 0.33
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.32
, chin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
crack in winter 1.00
crack 0.90
get in winter 0.84
crack in corners 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(skin, get in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lip, crack in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(skin, get in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(skin, get in winter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(skin, get in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(lip, crack in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(lip, crack in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lip, crack)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lip, get in winter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lip, get in winter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lip, get in winter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lip, crack)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lip, crack)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lip, crack)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lip, get in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lip, crack in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lip, crack in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(skin, get in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(lip, crack in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(skin, get in winter)