lipid bilayer: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lipid
Weight: 0.66
, protein
Weight: 0.63
, structure
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.54
Siblings transporter
Weight: 0.56
, phospholipid
Weight: 0.38
, extracellular matrix
Weight: 0.37
, tubulin
Weight: 0.37
, rna polymerase
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality worth 0.82
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(protein, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(transporter, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(protein, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(transporter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(transporter, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(transporter, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)