lisp: be hard to setup

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.69
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, speech
Weight: 0.49
Siblings clojure
Weight: 0.44
, english language
Weight: 0.36
, italian language
Weight: 0.35
, accent
Weight: 0.35
, chinese language
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard to setup 1.00
is hard 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(language, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lisp, be hard to setup)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(speech, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lisp, be hard to setup)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(speech, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(language, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(speech, is hard)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(language, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(english language, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chinese language, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(language, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(speech, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chinese language, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinese language, is hard)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(english language, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(english language, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lisp, be hard to setup)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lisp, is hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(lisp, is hard)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lisp, is hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lisp, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lisp, be hard to setup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(speech, is hard)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(language, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chinese language, is hard)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(english language, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(speech, is hard)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(lisp, be hard to setup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(language, is hard)