list: be at appointment in briefcase

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.62
, description
Weight: 0.60
, date
Weight: 0.60
, record
Weight: 0.60
Siblings calendar
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.31
, shelf
Weight: 0.31
, picnic table
Weight: 0.31
, variety
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at appointment in briefcase 1.00
be at appointment in desk drawer 0.87
be used to keep appointment 0.80
be used to remember appointment 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(calendar, be used to keep appointment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(calendar, be used to remember appointment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(calendar, be used to remember appointment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calendar, be used to remember appointment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(calendar, be used to keep appointment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(calendar, be used to keep appointment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(list, be at appointment in briefcase)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(list, be at appointment in desk drawer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(list, be at appointment in desk drawer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(list, be at appointment in desk drawer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(list, be at appointment in desk drawer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(list, be at appointment in briefcase)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(list, be at appointment in briefcase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(calendar, be used to keep appointment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(list, be at appointment in briefcase)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(calendar, be used to remember appointment)