list: be used writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.62
, description
Weight: 0.60
, date
Weight: 0.60
, record
Weight: 0.60
Siblings listing
Weight: 0.33
, calendar
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.31
, profile
Weight: 0.31
, shelf
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used writing 1.00
be in writing 0.95
be important in writing 0.93
is written 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(description, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(list, be used writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(description, be important in writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(description, be important in writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(listing, be in writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(description, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(list, be used writing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(listing, be in writing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(listing, be in writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(list, be used writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(list, be used writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(list, be used writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(description, be important in writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(listing, be in writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(list, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(description, be important in writing)