listen: requires talk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents work
Weight: 0.47
, guy
Weight: 0.46
, word
Weight: 0.41
, statement
Weight: 0.41
Siblings know
Weight: 0.30
, hear
Weight: 0.30
, think
Weight: 0.30
, stand
Weight: 0.29
, mike
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires talk 1.00
requires not talk 0.95
requires stop talk 0.90
requires not speak 0.83
requires stop talk and pay attention 0.82
requires not talk so much yourself 0.82
requires find something to think about 0.79
be used to speak 0.79
be speak 0.78
requires do 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(word, be speak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(listen, requires talk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(word, be used to speak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(listen, requires talk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(word, be used to speak)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(word, be speak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(word, be speak)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to speak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(think, requires do)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(word, be speak)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(listen, requires talk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(word, be used to speak)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(listen, requires talk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(think, requires do)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(think, requires do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(listen, requires talk)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(listen, requires not talk)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(listen, requires stop talk)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires not talk)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(listen, requires not talk)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(listen, requires not speak)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires stop talk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(listen, requires not talk so much yourself)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(listen, requires stop talk and pay attention)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(listen, requires not talk so much yourself)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires not speak)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(listen, requires stop talk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires stop talk and pay attention)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(listen, requires not talk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires not talk so much yourself)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(listen, requires stop talk and pay attention)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(listen, requires not speak)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(listen, requires stop talk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(listen, requires not speak)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(listen, requires stop talk and pay attention)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(listen, requires not talk so much yourself)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires talk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(listen, requires talk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(word, be speak)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(word, be used to speak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(think, requires do)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(word, be speak)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(listen, requires talk)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(word, be used to speak)