literature: be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.63
, chapter
Weight: 0.63
, study
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
Siblings dictionary
Weight: 0.59
, poetry
Weight: 0.36
, fiction
Weight: 0.34
, cinema
Weight: 0.34
, poem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption 1.00
be used to cause something 0.81
causes fatague 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tool, be used to cause something)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(study, causes fatague)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(study, causes fatague)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tool, be used to cause something)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(study, causes fatague)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tool, be used to cause something)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tool, be used to cause something)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(study, causes fatague)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(tool, be used to cause something)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(study, causes fatague)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(tool, be used to cause something)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(literature, be used to cause one to re-evaluate assumption)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(study, causes fatague)