litter: affect economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect economy 1.00
affect environment 0.80
have effect on tourism 0.76
affect things 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(garbage, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(litter, affect economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(garbage, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(litter, affect economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(trash, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(litter, affect economy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(litter, affect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(litter, affect things)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(litter, affect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(litter, affect things)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(litter, have effect on tourism)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(litter, affect environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(litter, affect things)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(litter, have effect on tourism)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(litter, have effect on tourism)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(litter, have effect on tourism)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(litter, affect economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(litter, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)