litter: be vs clumping

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs clumping 1.00
be vs non clumping 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(litter, be vs clumping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(litter, be vs clumping)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(litter, be vs clumping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(litter, be vs non clumping)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(litter, be vs clumping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(litter, be vs non clumping)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(litter, be vs clumping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(litter, be vs non clumping)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(litter, be vs clumping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(litter, be vs non clumping)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(litter, be vs clumping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(litter, be vs clumping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(litter, be vs clumping)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(litter, be vs clumping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(litter, be vs clumping)