living thing: interact in ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.75
, plant
Weight: 0.55
, nature
Weight: 0.52
, part
Weight: 0.45
, substance
Weight: 0.44
Siblings giant sequoia
Weight: 0.53
, here
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
interact in ecosystem 1.00
be in ecosystem interact 1.00
interact in pond ecosystem 0.93
be in ecosystem 0.91
interact in environment 0.90
be connected in ecosystem 0.90
interact with trash 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(part, be in ecosystem interact)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(living thing, interact in ecosystem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(part, be in ecosystem interact)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(part, be in ecosystem interact)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(part, be in ecosystem interact)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(living thing, interact in ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(living thing, interact in ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(living thing, be in ecosystem interact)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(living thing, be in ecosystem interact)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(living thing, be in ecosystem)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(living thing, interact in environment)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(living thing, interact in environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(living thing, be in ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(living thing, be in ecosystem interact)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(living thing, be in ecosystem interact)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(living thing, interact in environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(living thing, interact in environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(living thing, be in ecosystem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(living thing, be in ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(living thing, interact in ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(living thing, interact in ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(part, be in ecosystem interact)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(living thing, interact in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(part, be in ecosystem interact)