living: be important to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.59
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.57
, necessity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings life
Weight: 0.32
, paradise
Weight: 0.32
, sanctuary
Weight: 0.32
, poverty
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to animals 1.00
affect animals 0.91
be negative for animals 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(living, be important to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(living, affect animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(living, affect animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(living, affect animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(living, be negative for animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(living, be negative for animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(living, be negative for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(living, affect animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(living, be negative for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(living, be important to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(living, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(living, be important to animals)