living: be in east africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.59
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.57
, necessity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings life
Weight: 0.32
, paradise
Weight: 0.32
, sanctuary
Weight: 0.32
, poverty
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in east africa 1.00
be in north korea 0.87
be in south korea 0.86
be in north dakota 0.82
be in rural germany 0.76
be in coastal plain regions of georgia 0.76
is southeast coast good 0.75
was near atlantic ocean important for algonquian peoples 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(living, be in east africa)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(living, be in north korea)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(living, be in south korea)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(living, be in north dakota)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(living, be in north korea)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(living, be in south korea)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(living, be in north korea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(living, be in south korea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(living, be in south korea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(living, be in north korea)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(living, be in north dakota)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(living, be in coastal plain regions of georgia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(living, be in rural germany)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(living, be in north dakota)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(living, be in coastal plain regions of georgia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(living, be in coastal plain regions of georgia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(living, be in north dakota)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(living, was near atlantic ocean important for algonquian peoples)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(living, be in rural germany)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(living, be in coastal plain regions of georgia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(living, be in rural germany)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(living, was near atlantic ocean important for algonquian peoples)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(living, be in rural germany)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(living, was near atlantic ocean important for algonquian peoples)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(living, was near atlantic ocean important for algonquian peoples)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(living, be in east africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(living, be in east africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(living, be in east africa)