llama: be used in peru

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in peru 1.00
be important in peru 0.94
live in peru 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(llama, be used in peru)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(llama, live in peru)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(llama, live in peru)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(llama, live in peru)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(llama, live in peru)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(llama, be important in peru)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(llama, be important in peru)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(llama, be important in peru)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(llama, be important in peru)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(llama, be used in peru)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(llama, be used in peru)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(llama, be used in peru)