llama: be used protect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used protect 1.00
protect 0.95
protect themselves 0.88
protect from enemies 0.83
protect sheep 0.79
protect cows 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, protect sheep)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protect themselves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, protect themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(alpaca, protect themselves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(prairie dog, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, protect themselves)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(alpaca, protect sheep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(alpaca, protect sheep)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(llama, be used protect)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(llama, protect sheep)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(llama, protect sheep)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(llama, protect themselves)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(llama, protect themselves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect sheep)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(llama, protect cows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(llama, protect cows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(llama, protect sheep)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(llama, protect themselves)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect cows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(llama, protect cows)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(llama, protect from enemies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(llama, protect from enemies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(llama, protect from enemies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect from enemies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(llama, be used protect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(llama, be used protect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(alpaca, protect sheep)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(alpaca, protect themselves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(llama, be used protect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(prairie dog, protect themselves)