llama: have babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have babies 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(sheep, have babies)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(llama, have babies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(sheep, have babies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sheep, have babies)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(goat, have babies)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have babies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(sheep, have babies)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(llama, have babies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(goat, have babies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(goat, have babies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(alpaca, have babies)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(alpaca, have babies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(llama, have babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(llama, have babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(llama, have babies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(sheep, have babies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(goat, have babies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(alpaca, have babies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(llama, have babies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(sheep, have babies)