llama: have thick fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thick fur 1.00
have fur 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(llama, have thick fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have thick fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(llama, have thick fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(alpaca, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(alpaca, have thick fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(alpaca, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(alpaca, have fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(llama, have thick fur)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(llama, have fur)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(llama, have fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(llama, have fur)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(llama, have fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(llama, have thick fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(llama, have thick fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(alpaca, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(alpaca, have thick fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(llama, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)